Ask a new question


ME/CFSCerebral PalsyParkinson'sLong CovidMultiple SclerosisMCASCystic FibrosisStrokeEpilepsyEndometriosisMigraineALSLupus
Download community app

Ask a new question


ME/CFSCerebral PalsyParkinson'sLong CovidMultiple SclerosisMCASCystic FibrosisStrokeEpilepsyEndometriosisMigraineALSLupus
Download community app

TermsPrivacyDisclaimerContact

© 2026 Turnto

Long Covid/Search
Treatments
Treatments
Reported effectiveness
Meditation
Complimentary, TherapyView full page

Meditation

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

A structured approach using guided awareness to manage stress and symptoms.

18 research papers
45 expert views
57 patient views
Breath work
TherapyView full page

Breath work

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
Craniosacral therapy
TherapyView full page

Craniosacral therapy

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
Pacing
TherapyView full page

Pacing

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
Cold exposure
Complimentary, TherapyView full page

Cold exposure

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
Cognitive Rehabilitation
TherapyView full page

Cognitive Rehabilitation

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
Botox
Therapy, PharmacologicalView full page

Botox

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
Brain retraining
Complimentary, TherapyView full page

Brain retraining

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
Acupuncture
TherapyView full page

Acupuncture

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Therapy, RegenerativeView full page

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Researched
Quantity and depth of existing academic research
  1. ⬤ Minimal research: Very little scientific study exists, with no or very few peer-reviewed studies. Insufficient data for conclusions.
  2. ⬤⬤ Limited research: Few studies exist, mostly small trials or case reports. Findings are preliminary and lack strong validation.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately researched: Multiple studies, including mid-sized trials, exist. Some findings are replicated, but more research is needed.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Well-researched: Supported by substantial evidence, including at least one large trial or meta-analysis.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Extensively studied: Numerous large studies and meta-analyses exist. Findings are widely accepted with strong scientific consensus.
 
Ease of access
How easy it is for the average patient to access this treatment
  1. ⬤ Extremely Difficult to Access: Rare, experimental, or highly specialized. Requires multiple referrals, long wait times, travel, and strict follow-up.
  2. ⬤⬤ Difficult to Access: Limited to select centers with moderate barriers. Requires referral, potential travel, and wait times of weeks to months.
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Moderately Accessible: Available in larger hospitals or clinics. Requires a basic referral, with moderate wait times and some coordination.
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Easy to Access: Widely available in most clinics. Minimal referral, short wait times, and simple preparation or follow-up.
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ Trivial to Access: Easily found in pharmacies or clinics. No referral needed, minimal wait, and straightforward access.
 
1 of 2
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

Standardized breathing techniques that systematically rebuild respiratory health.

40 research papers
30 expert views
40 patient views
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

A structured, subtle manual approach aimed at optimizing craniosacral function.

1 research papers
5 expert views
27 patient views
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

A structured plan to manage and balance daily energy levels.

38 research papers
54 expert views
56 patient views
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

Brief, medically supervised extreme cold sessions to reduce inflammation.

4 research papers
9 expert views
50 patient views
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

Structured and evidence-based program targeting specific post-illness cognitive deficits.

20 research papers
4 expert views
29 patient views
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

An injectable neurotoxin regulating nerve signals for possible symptom relief

2 research papers
2 expert views
40 patient views
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

A structured program leveraging neuroplasticity, mindfulness, and cognitive strategies.

3 research papers
24 expert views
40 patient views
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

A targeted needle procedure applying precise, standardized body points.

40 research papers
4 expert views
40 patient views
Cost
How much in USD does it approximately cost for a patient to see the benefits of this treatment.
  1. ⬤ Up to $100
  2. ⬤⬤ Up to $500
  3. ⬤⬤⬤ Up to $2000
  4. ⬤⬤⬤⬤ Up to $10,000
  5. ⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤ More than $10,000
 
Reported effectiveness
The average perceived effectiveness of the treatment amongst the patient views found for this page.

To calculate the reported effectiveness for a patient view, the model first analyses whether it can be ascertained that the person writing the review has had direct experience of the treatment for themselves or a loved one. If so, it then uses sentiment analysis to rate their view from 1-5 on how effective this treatment was for them, with 1 being the least effective, and 5 the most effective.

 

A clinically regulated procedure transferring beneficial gut communities to recipients.

11 research papers
3 expert views
13 patient views